RTJ-99-1460, 31 March 2006), ruled that recordings of a conversation between a judge and another person (s) cannot be conducted in a judge’s chambers without the consent of all the parties to the conversation. 93833, 28 September 1995), and Office of the Court Administrator vs. ![]() The Supreme Court, in the cases of Mamba vs. In addition, Section 1 of the Act also makes it illegal to possess recordings recorded illegally in violation of the act or disseminate or spread such recordings to other parties, regardless of whether or not you were a participant in the illegal recording. Section 1 of the Anti-Wiretapping Act states that “It shall be unlawful for any person, not being authorized by all the parties to any private communication or spoken word, to tap any wire or cable, or by using any other device or arrangement, to secretly overhear, intercept, or record such communication or spoken word by using a device commonly known as a dictaphone or dictagraph or walkie-talkie or tape recorder, or however otherwise described.” ![]() Examples of such devices include cameras, phones, voice recorders, etc.įailure to obtain consent will result in a violation of The Philippines Anti-Wiretapping Law. Recording, in this case, refers to using a recording device to capture information. ![]() So if you’re trying to record a phone call or conversation, you need to make sure everyone taking part has consented to the recording, regardless of whether or not you’re taking part in the communication. The Philippines is a two-party consent state which means you must obtain the consent of all the parties to a conversation before recording.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |